El Fin

A final entry:

“Race is an inaccurate description or explanation of human biological variation.

Race is the partitioning of people arbitrarily into groups using biological and

cultural characteristics. Humans are actually more alike than they are different.”  -RACE (a program in place to lessen discrimination) go here for more information: http://www.understandingrace.org/home.html

3a.) Race is not biological. If it were biological we could determine a person’s race by simply studying their genes. But no specific gene codes for a specific race. Race is simply a classification of people with similar characteristics such as skin color and hair type. Society has created this misconception that race is in our genes. The sociological definition of race is the way we view a person and the way our mind consciously or unconsciously puts them in certain categories. I may decide that a woman is African American but she could indeed be from Latino background.  Read this article to simply learn about race: (http://www.understandingrace.org/resources/pdf/family_guide.pdf)

3b.) The IAT test or Implicit Association tests showed that I have a slight preference toward Caucasian individuals. This test focused on our minds subconscious and conscious view between black and white people with positive and negative words. I feel like the quick speed of the test only took away from the accuracy because people did not have time to sift through their true feelings about the person and/or word associated with him/her. I am not surprised that I have a slight preference for Caucasian individuals because I am white myself. People tend to gravitate toward people similar to them. For example, people with in common economic and social classes, with skin color, and with common interests are attracted to one another.

3c.) It is proven that African Americans are not biologically superior athletes because there is no gene that is linked with skin color and increased muscle mass, for example. However it is obvious that African descendents do perform better in sprinting and other athletics. This is due to the culture. Athletic ability is a great stress in African American culture. Many revolve their meal planning, exercise, and habits around there athletic training. In this way, the African American race does commonly prove to get ahead athletically.

4.) While taking my sociology class and reading articles about our society, I have picked up on a few things. First of all, I notice that I may have less control of my own life then I would like to think. The way I was born and brought up has such a large impact on my present and future life. Also, I found it interesting that wealth is accumulated generation from generation. It is very rare for a person to climb up the social latter even if they work hard. I have become less biased and like look at things on a larger scale overall. For example, I realize that my idea of proper grammar is different than Southerners or African Americans (habitual “be”). Overall, the class has opened my eyes and the articles I’ve read are quite fascinating.

The Food Movement

   In the Newsweek article Divided We Eat, Lisa Miller explains how America’s food consumption depends on multiple factors such a social class and personal views. In class we are watching a informational documentary concerning the social structure and stratification in American Society. The way food is consumed by Americans directly shows the differences in class. Miller writes, “What this means, in practical terms, is that the richest Americans can afford to buy berries out of season at Whole Foods…while the food insecure often eat what they can: highly caloric, mass-produced foods like pizza and packed cakes that fill them up quickly.” 

   So yes, the rich have more diverse and healthy options for their children.  They use it to show off and flaunt their lifestyle. Like Miller says, “Food is no longer trendy or fashionable. It is fashion.” And the lower class tends to rally toward the more sweet and unhealthy food. Is it an issue of values within a different culture? Does the upper class simply have more time to prepare a home cooked meal every night? So many factors may contribute to the growing concern.  Miller points out the scary truth, “America is among the most obese of nations; Japan, with its relatively low income inequality, is the thinnest.” So the correlation between social class inequality and obesity is proven.  36% of our nation’s 6-11 year olds are considered over-weight of obese. Even though there are obvious other societal pressures, the main concern is how to stop the growing obesity among the lower class children.

   Can we fill the gap between the food consumers of our country? There are programs set in stone to improve the issue of obesity, especially of our young.  Michelle Obama is a large advocate of anti-obesity campaigns in our present day. She started a campaign in February 2010 called “Let’s Move”. Later that year she proposed to instill dramatic action to build sidewalks, promote breast-feeding, and to ban deep fryers in schools. The following is from this website (http://www.politicsdaily.com/2010/05/11/michelle-obama-unveils-anti-childhood-obesity-action-plan/)   and explains her views and ambitions to change the food American children eat. 

“On March 16, Mrs. Obama, appearing before a Grocery Manufacturers Association conference in Washington told the industry representatives, "you all produce much of the food that our children eat -- and have marketed to them -- each day. The decisions you make determine what's in our grocery store shelves, what's in our school lunches, and what's in the thousands of advertisements our kids are exposed to each year. And I know that many of you are undertaking efforts to significantly reformulate your products -- and I hope that the time will come when all of you are." The issue has been recognized by many and changes are starting to occur.

Overall like the interviewee, Pollan, told Lisa Miller in Divided We Eat,

“The food movement is still very young.””

Social Stratification

“There is a sense in which the whole of Marx’s writing boils down to several embarrassing questions: Why is it that the capitalist West has accumulated more resources than human history has ever witnessed, yet appears powerless to overcome poverty, starvation, exploitation, and inequality?

                -Terry Eagleton (The Chronicle Review, In Praise of Marx)

In class we began to look at different ways that people are divided or stratified. Social stratification is defined as: the division of large numbers of people into layers according to their relative power, property, and prestige; applies to both nations and to people within a nation, society or other group.

Some countries, like India, divide their individuals into different categories in a caste system. One is born into and cannot move up or down into their specific placement in society. The lowliest people in this system are considered “impure” and are known as the untouchables. Some activist untouchables are fighting for integrity and equality in a civil right movement.  Here’s a video showing their fight and struggles in 2007 and is still occurring now:

So Karl Marx taught socialism over capitalism. He spoke of the possibility of dramatic change. This change consisted of different ways of dealing with money and economics, not the human consciousness. He was very level-headed and intelligent, but his ideas got blown out of proportion by the Communist regimes of China and Russia.  “He did not believe that men and women could surpass the Archangel Gabriel in sanctity. Rather, he believed that the world could feasibly be made a considerably better place.”  Karl Marx was reasonable because he had seen what capitalism and socialism could do. He knew that there were plenty of resources to share in the world. In Praise of Marx mentions, “ All he meant was that there are more than enough resources on the planet to resolve most of our material problems, just as there was more than enough food in Britain in the 1840s to feed the famished Irish populations several times over.”

Karl Marx

But what can we do? How can we solve this issue of unfair stratification in society?  Marx was famous for not laying out any future plans. Karl Marx was one of the first men to speak of the system by which we live by. He sought out the contradictions, historical origins, and the potential demise. He was sure to predict that if dramatic change was not considered, capitalism will only lead to major problems. Prosperity of some leads to suffering of others. Nations gain power by conquering and striping others of their rights.

This idea can be applied to any other group or society as well. Competiveness and “being better than your neighbor” has been taught to children since they were born.  One must compete for the best position in house baseball, for the place in school play, and for admission into the best college. The current fight in India is just one real-life and extreme example of social stratification in action. We are constantly being measured based on what power, prestige, and property these roles give us. Capitalism feeds on the idea that humans superficially and consciously strive for greatness and look down upon those who choose not to or who do not have the resources to do so.

"Man, I feel like a woman"

I’m a woman. And let me tell you, I enjoy it thus far. 

Yes, men will always continue to rate us on a “Hot or Not” scale. They’ll continue giving us a 7 for “average looking” or 10 for “sultry and sexy”.  But that is mostly society and their hormones talking. There are men out there (more than we think!) who embrace the idea that women, some of them “feminists”, can be strong in the work field and be great conversationalists. Even though they like to see their girlfriend in a nice tight dress with her hair and makeup done up all fancy, they still can have faith in her independence and strength as a person. This is all women can ask for right? Ladies like to admire the sexy male models in Calvin Klein ads, as well. No shame in that.

“Though Feminism has tended to treat beauty as a symbol of oppression, what lurks not far beneath the surface is the reality of beauty as power.” BEAUTY AS POWER.

"makeup"

While reading this week’s honors article, I understood there are many types of “feminists”. The most extreme, and my least favorite variety consists of a group of ladies who think wearing makeup is a violation of their personal rights. They think a simple enhancer is made by men to make them look beautiful for men. The article says, “Much of the argument against the beauty culture is based on the assumption that the sole purpose for aspiring to beauty is to attract men, despite substantial documentation that cultivating one’s appearance has both economic and psychic benefits that may be unrelated to sexual allure.”  Everyone wants to feel good about themselves. They want to feel beautiful. So like I said before, beauty is power. And makeup is one way to do just that for women. No shame in that.

In this blog here, I will connect this article and ideas to my own life, instead of a current event. My mother has raised me to be proud of being a woman. She was never taught that as a young child. She was taught to be submissive. This is called gender socialization. Her father told her he would only pay for her education if she became a nurse or teacher. These are very stereotypical woman jobs, especially at that time. These expectations were part of her gender role. This is defined as “the behaviors and attitudes considered appropriate because one is male or female”.  My grandpa was a loving man, but he expected my grandma to take care of his every need. He expected the same of my mother. My mother does cook, clean, and take care of us four children. However, she has strength and respect for herself. She makes my dad buy the groceries and take care of us, as well. Marriage is a two way street, and I see this working beautifully (most of the time) in my everyday life. My mom teaches me to appreciate my feminine characteristics. She tells me to love being a woman. We may be more sensitive and gentle, but we also have the power to use this to our advantage.

In all, like the wise and beautiful Marilyn Monroe once said,

“I don't mind living in a man's world, as long as I can be a woman in it."



We Need Women&Men to make the World Go Round: Literally.

In class today we had an almost civilized chat about defining ourselves through the help of our gender. Our society views women as sensitive, submissive, caring, and beautiful.  We view men as strong, dominant, intelligent, and handsome. “Boys fix things” and “Girls need things fixed”. Yes, there is a dividing line...

But do all boys solely value women for their quiet approach on life, or do most enjoy the women who take the issues in life by the horn, who enjoy a good hearty laugh, and who have a clear- cut view on their own success in the world? Do all ladies need a man in their life to live? Or do they value men for their pleasant company alone?  I think society focuses on the negative connotations of men and women’s needs. I’m sure a perfectly educated man could learn to cook and clean for himself and a women could learn to pay the bills and rent. When people get so tied up in these ideas, they lose sight of the idea that we are all human beings of one species with mostly the same anatomy.

The large gender gap was created in the beginning of time, when men ruled and women were considered property. Look how far we’ve come! However, issues are still apparent. Women may have been able to vote for Obama this past election, but they still can’t earn equal pay while working at Wal-Mart. Something with this picture is wrong. Wal-Mart discriminates against women doing the exact same work as their male counterparts. They deprive them of proper pay and therefore, equality. This may be one the largest class-action employment lawsuit in U.S. history. And it is all revolved around gender discrimiation.. Here is an article concerning this issue. http://articles.cnn.com/2010-04-26/justice/walmart.suit_1_wal-mart-stores-appeals-court-class-action?_s=PM:CRIME. So even though feminists may seem like they are fighting for nothing, they most definitely are fighting for something. They’re NOT fighting against men, they are fighting for themselves, daughters, and grandaughters.

In the honors article, the author speaks of how society influences the way people view others and themselves by putting them in stereotypical boxes. She writes, “Durkheim observed that human beings experience society’s influence as a force outside of themselves that constrains their behavior, and this observation has become a pervasive assumption in sociological theorizing.” So society constrains human behavior. Can society put constraints on the scope of woman success, intellectualism, and ability to hold powerful positions? Yes. And society does just what the article explains. Women view themselves as sensitive and weak because society further illustrates these messages through the media and everyday interactions. Women are a great example of the “Looking-Glass Self” hypothesis formulazined by a man, Charles Horton Cooley.

Oh, the irony in the world.

Is there a true "self"?

Each person struggles with the question, “Who am I?” Is it even a question to be asked, or is there not even a true self? I am perplexed about the answer. Yes, we are different from everyone else. We are each unique. We each have different beliefs, values, and personalities. But this is obvious, it is a given. However, something not so obvious that I pondered this week is this: do we have a true “self? Or do we become our “self” by conforming and learning from the society around us like Charles Horton Cooley suggests in his “Looking-Glass Self” hypothesis. Do we change into the person we’ve always wanted to be because of external or internal pressures? I think sociology mainly blames everything on the external world. But don’t we have any personal control over our lives?

In the article, “Mirror Self-Recognition and the Looking-Glass Self” by Leigh S. Shaffer, the issue of defining one’s creation of “self” is insightfully discussed.  Shaffer writes, “For the new social sciences, the self was “not a unitary structure, appearing full-blown” (Sherif, 1968, p. 153), but rather a developmental product of each individual interacting with its social and physical environment. “ So according to this article one’s “self” is not a predetermined characteristic in human nature.  We are created over time. This point seems obvious. But what is profound is the idea that we have less control over who we become than the world around us does. It is hard for certain people to accept that they do not have complete control over the world around them, and in who they’re becoming. However, you have control over who you become to a certain extent. You have the power to set goals and to achieve them. But some events and upraising, you have no control over. These fateful experiences in the social and physical world are large contributions to the creation of one’s “self”. A few examples can be the type of socio-economic class one is born in, certain family deaths, gender, and other uncontrollable experiences. If you are looking at yourself in the mirror you will really find the experiences and judgments of others around you, along with how you’ve acted to moments in your life, staring back. This is known as the “Looking-Glass Self”.

Like the article said, “..the adaptive problem faced by early humans is the need for individuals to justify their conduct to others.” This whole idea really ties into the way our society tries to always impress. Humans must justify every action. It may have to do with our competitiveness and self-conscious nature.

One of the best ways to describe this issue is by looking at the way people use technology. I know for myself and my friends, we enjoy the social network, Facebook.  It is addicting and, for most, a tool to create the person people would be impressed by. We even watched a movie on the new generation controlled by technology.  It may be “Peter Mattington”’s Facebook page, but in reality he’s not letting the whole human population really look into his soul over the internet. Some people get so hung up on the idea that everything on Facebook is reality. If “Peter Mattington” got a comment from the gal he liked saying “You’re so handsomeJ” , he would believe he was handsome. He would walk with straighter posture and a larger ego, just because of one simple comment on the internet. The virtual world is becoming a defining tool of many individuals. So once again, because of human nature, we give people what they want to see. By posting certain pictures, comments, and statuses “Peter Mattington” is truly living up to the Cooley’s “Looking Glass Self” hypothesis.

The Power of Language

How does language affect the way you think?

“The habits of mind that our culture has instilled in us from infancy shape our orientation to the world and our emotional responses to the objects we encounter.” –Guy Deutscher (Does Your Language Shape How You Think?)

Sociology is the study of society and how it affects an individual. We learn things from our surroundings. Whether it be form the media, our parents, or school most memories and impressions are unable to be erased. It makes all the difference when we learn these habits from an early age. We learn things and automatically become ethnocentric in our views of the world. We see the world from our own lenses because we are usually only familiar with one dominant way of life. It is not anyone’s fault that communication is difficult between cultures. Barriers like family expectations, gender roles, dress, and language cause culture’s to view the world differently.

 

Language is a special kind of thing. You’re able to communicate how you feel through your words. You can talk to people you care about and tell others you’re frustrated by using your knowledge of language and how different words can be more symbolic than others. In the article, Does Your Language Shape How You Think? Guy Deutscher discusses the impact one’s mother tongue has on the way they view several different societal aspects. He says, “New research has revealed that when we learn our mother tongue, we do after all acquire certain habits of thought that shape our experience in significant and often surprising ways.”  Any type of cultural practice is going to instill habits among its members, but language is very powerful.  Up-and –coming research is showing that language directly affects cultural views and routine.

For example, Deutscher talks about how in languages such as Spanish and French the gender of all people is specified within their word they are speaking with.  When saying neighbor there are two versions, each one for a different gender. So the French and Spanish are not ever searching for the gender of an individual, unlike Americans. These foreign languages oblige the speakers to mention the gender.

Also, most European languages contain built in gender in their inanimate objects. These grammatical genders shape whether these cultures view the subject, such as a fork, as masculine or feminine. Deutscher says, “Nonetheless, once gender connotations have been imposed on impressionable young minds, they lead those with a gendered mother tongue to see the inanimate world through lenses tinted with associations and emotional responses that English speakers- struck in their monochrome desert of “its”- are entirely oblivious to.”

el tenedor: masculine object in spanish.

So the way we view the world is completely relative to what we have been exposed to as children. Our language can have an impact on what we view as important and how we think about certain words and meanings. Different cultures value different things due to language. For example, the remote Australian tongue called Guugu Yimithirr refers to everything based on the directions on a compass. This short article further explains a situation in which this occurs, “http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=how-language-shapes-thought. Like Deutscher says, “So different languages certainly make us speak about space in very different ways.”

Overall, languages across the world cause people to view objects, people, and space in a different light. One language that I would like to bring to attention is sign language. They have simplified versions of our words. Imagine you could not use your words and you never learned the verbal words of your native home. This would cause you to communicate differently with everyone around you. Because deaf people have never heard the negative or positive connotations of some words, they can only understand through body language. This is a video about how communication between a couple differs from other couples. After all, life and sociology is all about relativism. This boy and girl still learn to communicate, but her views on language are different than his. It is all about where you are and what your situation entails.

Food in society: what determines how we eat?

One’s eating habits are effected by everything about you and around you. We might not notice it, but what we eat depends on numerous societal aspects.  Leon Rapport sums it up in his essay, “In short our anxieties, aspirations, and modes of relating to others are embodied in our food habits.”

In this current blog I will break down what effects how we eat and why “you are what you eat”.

Gender:  Women eat differently than men because society puts more pressure on women to look thin and fit. Rapport writes, “Innumerable studies have shown weight-reduction dieting of one sort or another to be virtually epidemic among young women and girls.” Men are generally more spontaneous and less cautious about what they consume. The millions of ads, movies, and television shows showcasing beautiful and thin woman cause females of every age to watch their diet.

Economic class: The way one eats can help define what social economic class one belongs to. Rapport explains the issue. “People trying to move into a higher social class are likely to modify their food habits by abandoning McDonald’s and Pizza Hut in favor of more upscale restaurants.” McDonalds is quicker and cheaper for a person working two jobs for minimum wage. It can be seen as a sign of carelessness. It’s a sad reality that one’s salary can affect one’s life in numerous negative ways, such as mood-swings and overall poor health.

Age: Depending on your age, one feels different pressures from society. These pressures and events in different time periods cause people to eat the way they eat.  Rapport writes, “When viewed across the entire life span, food habits stand out as most likely to be changeable, unstable, and potentially a threat to health during both adolescence and old age.” When one becomes older they become more prone to injury and illness that leave them susceptible to depression and anxiety. Rapport really explains the main reason why adolescent’s food habits are so easily at risk. ““The proverbial peer pressure may influence not only their hair and clothing styles but also their eating habits.” Overall, senior citizens and teenagers go through the greatest amount of emotional turmoil. While looking at their eating habits one can easily assume the societal pressure that is causing them to consume a specific diet or type of food.  

Geographic Location: Depending on where one is specifically located on the globe, effects what one would eat. For example, “Beef rates are high in American and low in India; puppy dogs are a treat in parts of Asia, as are raw-fish dishes and whale meat in Japan. Most Americans reject kidneys, frog legs, and snails. Prairie oysters (bulls’ testicles) and rattle snake meat are acceptable in parts of the western U.S. but not elsewhere.” Geographic location is one of the most determining factors on one’s eating habits. Even if one was Mexican in the United States they would still be more prone to eat hamburgers than they originally would in Mexico. Where one is living has such an impact on every aspect of their life.

In addition there are other societal pressures that add to why we are what we eat.  For example Leon Rappoport mentions how coaches of organized sports encourage people of all ages to eat healthy. Also, certain religions prohibit its members from eating and drinking certain foods and drinks. If one looks at the sole issue of food consumption, it is easy to see that peoples’ surroundings and societal pressures determine what he/she will eat for the rest of their life.

If we look at this issue in our world today we will notice the rise of obesity. Our American norms are shifting. With our technological advances and faster pace society, fast food is becoming more popular. In 2009 adult obesity increased in 23 states and didn’t decrease in one single state. Physical activity is becoming less of a priority while computer game and television popularity is rising. It is amazing how people neglect to see that they’re allowing themselves to live an unhealthy life that will eventually lead to alarming health issues.

It's all about Perspective: Norms and Sanctions

I was sick all week with a nasty respiratory virus, causing me to miss 3 days of school. This experience has allowed me to stumble upon a perfect real life example of a sociological norm and sanctions.

Norm: what exceptions, thoughts, feelings are appropriate within a given group or culture.

Sanction:  a reward or punishment that results from a norm being followed or violated.

In the United States and especially well off towns like mine, kids are supposed to go to school. It is a norm.  If they do not they get behind in material their fellow students are learning and quickly try to play the catch up game before their  grades begin to sink with them. This negative consequence is called a sanction.  There are many positive sanctions for following this norm, as well. For example, one who attends school on a daily basis will eventually have the ability to attend college and one day get a worthwhile career. On a smaller scale, one will simply be on track with his classmates if he attends school. He won’t be trying to make up tests or homework, like I find myself right now.

Like I showed you with my example above, sanctions come in all different “shapes and sizes”. They can be positive, if you followed the norm, or negative, if you neglected to behave appropriately for that certain group or culture. But they also can be temporary and short term consequences of your actions or permanent and long term consequences.

Here’s an example relating to our world today:

Big Love: a TV show on HBO about a man with three wives and children with each.

There are laws in our states that that say it is illegal to have more than one married spouse. The term is known as polygamy or sometimes bigamy. It is against the norm. That is in the greater picture of our country. However, The Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (FLDS) have a different view on polygamy. They are a community filled with husbands with more than one wife and children with each. They view this behavior as a norm. The greater of the country however, views this type of lifestyle as inappropriate, and there for violating a social norm. Polygamists are violating the norm of marrying one single spouse and only having children with that one person, according to each state government. But if a man in FLDS decides to only have one spouse that is going against their norm.

Here's a link about Polygamy in America: http://www.pri.org/politics-society/polygamy-in-america1873.html

So our norms are relative. They depend on what group, big or large, a single individual belongs to. If I lived in a rough neighborhood, and did not attend school for 3 days, one would not assume I was sick right away. Worse things keep kids away from school than illness in high crime areas. But in my school illness is usually the root to school absence. Overall, it is all about perspective.

It's all about perspective...

Remaining Socially Relevant

In the study of sociology, culture is a large defining part of how societal values are determined and how that society affects the individual. Napoleon A. Chagnon; an anthropologist, who specifically studies culture; wrote an informative essay, “Doing Fieldwork Among the YanomamÖ,” about a specific aggressive Indian tribe. He defined how certain cultural values led to the society functioning and acting as a whole. While reading the article, one may find themselves judging the way these people live. This is known as ethnocentrism.

“Ethnocentrism: The use of one’s own culture as a yardstick for judging the ways of other individuals or societies, generally leading to a negative evaluation of their values, norms, and behaviors.” (Sociology, textbook)

Instead of being ethnocentric, and only thinking of terms of your own life, one should become culturally relative. Cultural relativism is the exact opposite as ethnocentrism. Cultural relativism encumbers the idea that the observer forgoes judging the new culture by trying to understand and relate.

So while studying the YanomamÖ, Napoleon A. Chagnon, had a duty to remain culturally relevant. With the initial culture shock, it is difficult for any researcher to refrain from judging and making assumptions right off the bat.               

In short, The YanomamÖ is a culture with very different values that reflect their very different society. They are a primitive Indian group of southern Venezuela. Overall, there are 125 scattered YanomamÖ villages in the area that live with different morals and traditions than that of the United States.

The YanomamÖ culture affects the way each member portrays one another and determines how each individual will react to their surroundings. For example, the YanomamÖ value toughness, so there lifestyle is full of violence and aggression toward their own villagers or surrounding tribes. Chagnon wrote, “The important thing is that the man has displayed his potential for violence and the implication is that other men better treat him with respect and caution.” In the YanomamÖ society, a male’s strong and respectable character is defined by his likelihood to lash out on anyone who “rattles his bee’s nest” Unlike our culture in the states, the YanomamÖ men are praised for beating their wives, killing their neighbors, and robbing the innocent. All men in the tribe fight for what they believe in physically and they would not stand to be denied. Chagnon captures this idea, “YanomamÖ refused to accept “no” for an answer until or unless it seethed with passion and intimidation.”

Even though the YanomamÖ seem foreign to us as readers, there are many common similarities. Men are honored when they stick up for their beliefs, punish men who hurt their women, and protect their deceased ancestor’s reputation. Our inability to first sight similarities and instead notice the blatant differences comes back to the idea of ethnocentrism. In class, when we read two articles observing two cultures called the “Narcirema” and the “Asu”, we came to a quick conclusion that these cultures are barbaric and insensible. For example, I quickly judged the woman of the Narcirema culture who burn their heads in an oven. I failed to notice that American woman instead cut and probe  their body in order to look younger and more fit. If we look at the Narcirema and Asu in a culturally relevant way we realize that the Narcirema shrines represent American bathrooms and the Asu rac’s represent American cars. Overall, their society makes sense to them, like our society makes sense to us.

In sociology, it is always important to look at things in a culturally relevant ways instead of jumping to quick judgmental conclusions.We must remain open minded (picture). It will help on understand how that particular society truly functions and why.

In our world today, we see people remaining ethnocentric all the time. Ethnocentrism is one of main reasons for divisions among race, religion, and gender. Each group judges the other because they don’t bother to look at the other side of the spectrum. For example, the United States has always viewed itself as the “power house”. Americans view their own nation as more economically sound, culturally diverse, and more dominant in foreign affairs. This is shown by the United States involvement in many conflicts around the world. Right now, the United States are heavily involved in the Middle East, trying to be the authoritative and more powerful nation. In reality, we are being ethnocentric, because we think our way is the right way. Being ethnocentric doesn’t always demonstrate selfishness and greed because it is natural to try to change things to your familiar perspective. Overall, ethnocentrism is everywhere in society. (see link) http://www.yourdictionary.com/grammar/examples/examples-of-ethnocentrism.html

We Create This: meanings we may not mean.

To make a long story short: a group of young and promising men and their loved one’s crashed in the bitterly cold and barren Andes and chose to eat the dead men for survival. Many of you will cringe and reread the last part of the sentence.

They ate the dead men for survival.

Cannibalism; our society views it as grotesque and unacceptable. And most of the time it is. But if you were dropped into the freezing snowy mountains with absolutely no food source, would you face a slow and scary death or would you put an effort into maintaining your life, if not for yourself, but for your family praying for back home?  Like one of the men said, “We have a duty to survive. If we don’t eat the bodies, it is a sin. We must do this not just for our own sakes but also for our families.” In the end, three courageous men gathered enough strength to hike for help. They were saved. One man said, “It was like holy communion. God gives us the body and blood of Christ in Holy Communion. God gave us these bodies and blood to eat.” It’s a simple story of survival. However, to many it’s simply extreme because these men broke truly embedded social standards. Society puts an arbitrary meaning on human bodies.

Humans are “not food”.  We have symbols and meanings for each item, concept, and activity in our life. Humans are not for eating, mathletes is for losers, and marriage is supposed to be full of love and fun.  Symbolic interactionism is how people use symbols to develop their views of the world and how they communicate with people. In the show, Freaks and Geeks, dodge ball resembles pain for the geeks and the smocking patio resembles the hangout for all the burnouts. Nothing comes with built in meaning, people in society give it meaning.

So the men stranded in the middle of the Andes Mountains needed to decide, were they going to change the meaning of “the human body”? Would they go against social norms to refrain from starvation? The answer is yes, they ate the meat of the frozen men on the flight F-227. They survived.

Eventually, since there was no other men or women in their “social location”, eating human meat became normal. The human body now symbolized nutrition energy, and survival. In the article it said, “The dead became part of their lives.” The meanings of everything around us can change depending on our viewpoint and situation.

In recent years, divorce rates have climbed higher. We can apply the sociological theorem of symbolic interactionism to this situation. Over the years, marriage has grown to be more exciting, personal, and full of pressure. The meaning of “love” has become more important for marriage compared to the 1940’s, for example. The meaning of children and the meaning of parenthood has evolved. These two elements have become stress factors on marriage. There is so much pressure to have beautiful children and to be perfect parents. Also, the role of husband and wife has become blurred. In the 1940’s men worked and women looked after household chores. Now, it is hard to organize specific roles for a wife and husband because women are gaining more self righteousness. Also, one of the most symbolic changes is the meaning of divorce itself. Before, it used to be irresponsible and immortal to divorce your spouse. Now, divorce means freedom and new beginnings. All these changes in symbolism have led to 1.1 million more divorces than in 1890. Our society changes the meanings of things and has direct consequences, as predicted by the symbolic interactionism theory.

Divorce occurs because society is changing; our views are changing. Here's a link explaining the top 10 reasons for divorce. All of the elements have some tie to societal standards and expectations that people create. We create the world we live in, even if it's a latent disfuntion, we create it.

http://www.divorceguide.com/free-divorce-advice/marriage-and-separation-advice/the-10-most-common-causes-of-divorce.html

Science: the common explanation

   We, humans, are interested in the world around us. Science, and all its subcategories, forms theories and explanations for the natural occurrences and social aspects of our existence. Sociology is one detailed way of categorizing the scientific details of the human nature versus society.  James M. Henslin wrote, “Sociology offers a framework that provides a penetrating perspective on almost everything that we do in life.” Why do we feel like someone is always watching and judging? Why do we value what we value?  And act like we act? 

  In class, we discussed the ways religion, economic status, family expectations, gender roles, and cultural expectations can affect the way one lives. Usually, like the place where Ted and Zelda lived, those who live in a "well-off" area are educated. The importance of education for money becomes so engraved in these wealthier children's mind that they may become blinded by the real value in learning. Society makes people oblivious to the original importance of such simple morals. Little do people know that these actions and values directly effect the people around them.

   The illustrative article, What Is Sociology? Comparing Sociology and the Other Social Sciences helps one understand how the study of sociology fits into the scientific world as a whole. Sociology is a specialized field of social science. Social sciences specifically deal with human behavior. James M. Henslin helped me understand and become deeply interested in all different angles of the human behavior. He compared and defined the anthropology, economics, political science, psychology, and sociology.

   What I find bothersome is the fact that he separates each specialized field and their definitions. He didn’t really wrap together the point that I was looking for all along. In reality, all these social sciences have one major purpose, to define why humans function the way they do. They should not be so isolated when trying to explain the complexity of human deeds. For one to truly understand humanity, they must piece together information from each individual social science to even come close to a realistic summation. One does not kill themselves, for example, for solely societal issues and pressures. Psychology issues, or inner problems, adds to this severe pain too. Figuring out how to connect and be aware of all social science causes and effects takes a brilliant man with a brilliant brain.

   In another article called The Promise C Wright Mills wrote, “ordinary men do not usually know what this connection (between their own lives and the course of world history) means for the kinds of men they are becoming and for the kinds of history making in which they might take part.” Ordinary men do not realize the effect they can have on the history of our society. For example, social “norms” become common among certain cultures because people follow trends..One person can create a domino effect that can alter the way plenty of people live their life. There is a high chance that this “ordinary” person has no idea the effect their behavior has on others and society as a whole.

   Social actions are similar to DNA. They are engraved in our being from the moment we’re born. And our actions most often originate from our parents. Humanity has unspoken rules and expectations. We are taught to recognize achievement as a good salary and an impressive educational record. We are expected to “act like a lady” or “be a man”.  We follow these invisible rules that society and our souls have implemented on us and act our best to be content with whom we’re becoming. After all, society does not always try to hurt our beings. 


Society puts a negative spin on the term "alone". Here's a video showing that being alone can be the best way to get a grip on your life. To appreciate those few minutes when all you have to do is ponder your thoughts.

Who Am I?

Who am I?

I’m Nicole: daughter of dentist, Dave, and nurse, Linda. I have three siblings, two brothers, and one sister. I am a true middle child. I don’t appreciate a lot of attention. With such a large family, I’ve learned to kick back and “go with the flow”.  I can be quiet when I’m nervous and intimidated or I can be fairly outgoing. Overall, I’m just a laid back person going along with things while still planning for my future.

I’m a person who loves the experiences in life. I appreciate events and trips more than possessions. Not to say that I do not appreciate certain obtainable objects, I just find lasting gratitude in something I’m able to feel. For example, my mission trip this summer was amazing. It really helped me realize some things about God and myself. I also love to travel. I enjoy the sun and the snow. I can snowboard and ski, but I mostly prefer the exhilaration I get from boarding. There’s nothing more refreshing then speeding down the Colorado hills in the brisk winter air on a powder day.

My biggest influences are my parents, siblings, and friends. Mostly my mother lectures me and teaches me everything. My dad is the funny one, and my siblings are always along for the ride. My older brother has really showed me how to have fun and still do well in school and athletics. Also, my friends influence me. We all enjoy hanging out on Friday and Saturday nights. However, most of my friends are very focused academically as well. With my friends, there is never ever a dull moment, and I love each and every one of them.

My goal in life is to be happy. I want to go to college and perhaps become a nurse. I’m not quite sure what college will be the best fit for me because I’m only a junior. But I know that whatever my occupation is, it will involve helping people. I don’t want to sit in a cubicle-calling people who don’t want to hear my voice. I want to lend a hand to people who actually need help. And since I find science fascinating I plan on becoming a doctor or nurse. But my general purpose in life is to be happy with who I am and who I will become.

Overall, I’m me.